Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Light v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 13, 2010

DANIEL LIGHT AND URSULA LIGHT, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., AS SUCCESSOR TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., OXFORD MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A NEW YORK CORPORATION; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN, OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO PLAINTIFF'S TITLE, OR ANY CLOUD ON PLAINTIFF'S TITLE THERETO, AND; DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Hon. A. Howard Matz

ORDER

Having considered the Joint Stipulation of the Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., erroneously sued as JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as successor to Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., and Plaintiffs Daniel Light and Ursula Light, by and through their respective counsel, for an order that the above entitled case be remanded to State court for all purposes, and after reading the second amended complaint on file, the Court finds that good cause appears, and that the second amended complaint does not contain a question of Federal law, it is therefore ordered that:

1. The case shall be remanded back to California State Court, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles.

Hon. A. Howard Matz United States District Court

20100113

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.