Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Boyd v. Robles

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION


January 14, 2010

RICKEY DONNELL BOYD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
A. ROBLES, DEFENDANT.

ORDER

Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #51) pursuant to Rule 37 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss seeks to have your case dismissed. A motion to 22 dismiss under Rule 37 or 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. You must timely respond to all motions. The Court may, in its discretion, treat your failure to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing this action. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence, no later than February 5, 2010.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after service of Plaintiff's response.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

20100114

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.