UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 22, 2010
ROMIE S CHUA AND CONSUELO O CHUA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
KB HOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY, AMERICAN BENEFIT MORTGAGE, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY; TRUSTEE CORPS, A UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY, BANK UNITED-FSB, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY AND CENTRAL MORTGAGE, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson
Order Remanding Case to State Court and Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as Moot [Motion filed December 6, 2009]
Presently before the Court is Defendant Central Mortgage's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Dkt. No. 4.) Defendants removed this case from state to federal court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. In their Opposition, Plaintiffs state that they are not alleging any claims arising under federal law, and ask the Court to remand the case back to San Bernardino County Superior Court.
The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' complaint and confirmed that it does not allege any claim arising under federal law. The complaint lists only state law causes of action, and although it refers, in passing, to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), Plaintiffs' Opposition confirms that none of their state law claims are predicated on a RESPA violation or any other violation of federal law. The Court therefore concludes that no federal claims remain for decision, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law causes of action. 18 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this case to state court. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.