Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ishikawa v. Quality Loan Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 26, 2010

SOON J. ISHIKAWA, GLENN SONG, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, CORPORATION; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; ANDY KIM; DAVID COOKS; DEBORA K. COOKS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson

Order Granting Defendant JP Morgan Chase's Motion to Dismiss [Motion filed on December 4, 2009]

Presently before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase")'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Glenn Song and Soon J. Ishikawa's First Amended Complaint ("FAC").

Chase contends that Plaintiffs failed to file a timely opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and that their failure to do so should be deemed consent to dismissal.

Central District Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to any motion at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

The hearing on Chase's Motion to Dismiss was scheduled for January 11, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition was therefore due by December 28, 2009. Plaintiffs did not file an opposition until December 31, 2009. Even so, Plaintiffs are litigating this case in pro per, and their opposition was not so late as to preclude Chase from filing a responsive reply brief. Accordingly, the Court will exercise its discretion to consider the arguments raised in Plaintiffs' opposition.

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Plaintiffs' opposition states that Soon J. Ishikawa -- one of the two named plaintiffs in this case -- has voluntarily withdrawn all of her claims. Although the docket does not reflect the filing of a voluntary dismissal, the Court accepts the representation in Plaintiffs' opposition as true, and dismisses Ishikawa from the case.

Next, the Court notes that Plaintiffs' opposition makes no attempt to defend any of the federal law violations alleged in the FAC. The opposition addresses only the state law wrongful foreclosure claim. Song contends, in general, that Chase foreclosed on his property after he filed for bankruptcy, and in so doing, violated an automatic stay order.

The Court deems Song's failure to address any of the federal claims set forth in the FAC consent to their dismissal. Because no claims arising under federal law remain for decision in this case, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Song's state law wrongful foreclosure claim, see 28 U.S.C. 1367(c), and remands this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100126

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.