Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lopez v. Chertoff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION


January 26, 2010

JUAN CARLOS VALADEZ LOPEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew Senior U.S. District Court Judge

Order re: Bill of Costs for Defendants Lown and Van Zandt

[189]

The Court is in receipt of Defendants Lown and Van Zandt's Bill of Costs filed on December 15, 2009. The Court has also reviewed Plaintiff's objections to the Bill of Costs filed on December 22, 2009. Having considered all papers and arguments, THE COURT NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS:

The Court hereby finds that Defendants' Bill of Costs is untimely and therefore is DENIED. Pursuant to Local Rule 292, Defendants Lown and Van Zandt had fourteen days from the entry of judgment to bring their Bill of Costs. The Court closed this case in its Order of October 26, 2009. The Court stated that all claims against all defendants had been resolved at that time. The present Bill of Costs was submitted on December 15, 2009.

Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 292 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, the Court DENIES Defendants' Bill of Costs as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED

20100126

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.