IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 27, 2010
REMAR SALANGO, PETITIONER,
D.K. SISTO, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has filed a motion for the court to accept his amended traverse and a motion for judicial notice.
Petitioner asks the court to take judicial notice of two unpublished cases which, he alleges, outline the proper standards for considering a habeas petition that challenges the denial of parole. Although the court will consider the applicable law when it reaches the merits of this case, it declines to take judicial notice of these cases because the cases themselves are not adjudicative facts. Fed. R. Evid. 201 (a).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner's request that the court accept his amended traverse (docket no. 10) is granted; and
2. Petitioner's motion for judicial notice (docket no. 11) is denied.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.