Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martinez v. Main Street California II

January 28, 2010

BAYARDO MARTINEZ AND ROBERTO NAVARRO, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA II, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 THOUGH 100, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. James Larson United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs BAYARDO MARTINEZ and ROBERTO NAVARRO ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant, MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA II, INC. ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, this case was commenced on November 6, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and thereafter on December 2, 2009, Defendants filed their Answer;

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2009, this Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, and set the following schedule:

The last day for the parties to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement,

ADR process selection, and a discovery plan is January 27, 2010.

The last day for the parties to file the ADR Certification signed by the parties and counsel is January 27, 2010.

The last day for the parties to file either the Stipulation to ADR Process or the Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference is January 27, 2010.

The last day for the parties to file their Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objections in Rule 26(f) Report and file a Case Management Conference Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement is February 10, 2010.

The Initial Case Management Conference is February 17, 2010.

WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in informal discovery and have met and conferred in person and on the telephone regarding, among other things, the status of the case;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that further informal discovery and discussions are necessary in order to properly evaluate the case and meaningfully comply with their obligations under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.