The opinion of the court was delivered by: Peter S. Hecker
[Complaint Filed: Dec. 4, 2009]
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT [Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a)]
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a), plaintiff Jason Standiford, on the one hand, and defendant Palm, Inc. and specially appearing defendant Sprint Nextel Corp. (collectively "defendants") on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that defendants' time within which to answer, move or otherwise plead with respect to the Complaint on file in this action shall be extended to and including February 10, 2010.
The parties have not previously stipulated to an extension of defendants' time within which to respond to the Complaint in this action.
THE PARTIES HEREBY SO STIPULATE.
Dated: January 29, 2010 EDELSON McGUIRE, LLC PARISI & HAVENS, LLP MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER Attorneys for Plaintiff JASON STANDIFORD
Dated: January 29, 2010 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP PETER S. HECKER Attorneys for Defendant PALM, INC. and Specially Appearing Defendant SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories listed above.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...