Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dynes v. Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 29, 2010

JOHN RAY DYNES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O JUAN MEDINA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT CONTACT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REGARDING MISHANDLING OF PLAINTIFF'S LEGAL DOCUMENTS (Doc. 56)

This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff John Ray Dynes, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Fresno County Jail. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed April 24, 2008, against Defendants Medina and Williams for use of excessive physical force, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff's claim arises from an incident which occurred while he was incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison. This matter is set for a telephonic trial confirmation hearing on February 24, 2010, and jury trial on March 15, 2010.

On January 26, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court contact the Sheriff's Department regarding the mishandling of his legal documents. In the motion, Plaintiff represents that he mailed his pretrial statement on December 20, 2009, and implies that since it was not received by the Court for filing, it was mishandled at the jail.

For reasons set forth fully in the Court's second order to show cause, issued concurrently with this order, the Court is skeptical that Plaintiff mailed what is purportedly his pretrial statement on December 20, 2009. However, even assuming the truth of Plaintiff's assertion that he did turn the document over to jail officials for mailing, his motion requesting that the Court contact the Sheriff's Department over the matter is HEREBY ORDERED DENIED because there is no legal basis supporting the form of relief sought and it is not otherwise appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100129

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.