Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

O'Rourke v. O'Connor

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 10, 2010

JAMES O'ROURKE, PETITIONER,
v.
BRYAN O'CONNOR, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner, a former state prisoner currently on parole and proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 9, 2009, the court directed respondents to file a response to the petition within 60 days. That deadline was extended on September 8, 2009, and again on October 1, 2009, to December 6, 2009. To date, no response has been filed. Respondents shall show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this order why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court's rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. The filing of a response to the petition within the time permitted by this order will constitute an adequate response to this order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100210

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.