Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Elrite v. Martel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 10, 2010

GARY LEE ELRITE, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

Petitioner, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The filing fee has been paid. Upon review of the habeas petition, the court finds that it is incomplete. Petitioner has not provided this court with the name and location of the court that entered the judgment of conviction being challenged. In addition, petitioner has not informed this court whether he has exhausted state court remedies for each of the grounds for which he seeks federal habeas relief and, if so, how he has allegedly done so.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the service of this order, petitioner shall file a response to this order by providing the court with the information requested above.

20100210

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.