UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 12, 2010
DAVID CARLTON BROWN, PETITIONER,
M.E. POULOS, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Doc. No. 39
On November 24, 2009, Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes entered a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 39). The Report and Recommendation, expressly incorporated herein, thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed Petitioner's claims and recommended that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) be denied. Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 40). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument.
In his objections, Petitioner sets forth essentially the same arguments raised in his original petition. As the Report and Recommendation fully and properly responds to these arguments, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
In his objections to the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner requests reconsideration of the writ of habeas corpus and appointment of counsel. As the court denies the petition, these requests are moot. Therefore, the court hereby DENIES Petitioner's request for reconsideration and for appointment of counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.