Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zewdu v. Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO


February 16, 2010

HANNA ZEWDU, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Court Judge

SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Hanna Zewdu and Defendant Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan (collectively referred to as the "Parties") through their respective counsel stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2009, pursuant to the Parties's stipulation, the Court reset the hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion and Cross-Motion for Judgment for April 30, 2010 (Docket Entry #43);

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Compel, which was assigned to Judge Maria-Elena James (Docket Entry #24);

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2009, Judge James denied Plaintiff's Motion to Compel without prejudice in accordance with the Court's Standing Order Re Discovery (Docket Entry #32);

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, the Parties filed Joint Letters to Judge James regarding the Parties's discovery dispute;

WHEREAS, the discovery dispute is still pending and the Parties await Judge James's ruling on the Joint Letters;

WHEREAS, the Parties do not believe that the pending discovery dispute will be resolved prior to February 26, 2010, when Plaintiff must file her Rule 52 Motion for Judgment, and seek to extend certain case deadlines to permit sufficient time for the resolution of the discovery issues;

WHEREAS, the Parties have sought two extensions of time in this matter, including the ADR deadline and the hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion and Cross-Motion for Judgment;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

The case deadlines are now as follows:

Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: May 21, 2010

Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: June 4, 2010

Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: June 18, 2010

Defendant's Reply: July 2, 2010

Hearing: July 16, 2010

Dated: February 12, 2010

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The case deadlines are now as follows:

Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: May 21, 2010

Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: June 4, 2010

Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: June 18, 2010

Defendant's Reply: July 2, 2010

Hearing: July 16, 2010 July 23, 2010

20100216

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.