Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carter v. U-Store-It

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 16, 2010

RAMON CARTER
v.
U-STORE-IT, L.P. ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Gary Allen Feess, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The parties are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:

: Defendants did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiffs have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). The parties can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default, filing an answer to the complaint or by dismissing the complaint.

The Court is aware that the parties are considering settlement of the matter; however further action is required at this time.

The parties must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100216

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.