Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Morada Music, LLC v. Hays

February 18, 2010

MORADA MUSIC, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LOWELL HAYS, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.



(PROPOSED) JUDGMENT

By Motion of December 1, 2009, plaintiff Morada Music, LLC, ("MORADA") filed an application for a default judgment against defendant Lowell Hays.

By Order of January 27, 2010, the Court "DEFERRED" its ruling on the motion for a default judgment, "pending supplemental application and showing of proof as to the judgment amount."

In the Court's Order of January 27, 2010, the Court indicated that it appeared that MORADA also "...seemed to ask for an unspecified and unsubstantiated amount of expectation damages."

In its response to the Court's January 27, 2010, Order, MORADA indicated that its claim for damages was limited to the amount of $117,734.23 as the Court found in its January 27, 2010 Order "...in pursuing the joint venture and in honoring the January 4, 2008 and March 6, 2009 Distribution Agreements."

The Court has found, as indicated in its January 27, 2010 Order, that plaintiff MORADA has "Satisfied All Procedural Requirements for Default Judgment."

The Court therefore enters JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff Morada Music, LLC, and against defendant Lowell Hays in the amount of $117,734.23. Costs shall be determined by application to the Clerk of Court.

Submitted by: /s/ Allen Hyman Attorney for Plaintiff

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State to the within action. My business address is 10737 Riverside Drive, North Hollywood, California 91602. of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party

On February 18, 2010, I served the foregoing document described as (PROPOSED) JUDGMENT the parties in this action by placing a copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows:

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

[X] (BY MAIL) to the addressees as indicated on the attached Service List, as follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at North Hollywood, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postage cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

[ ] (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the addressee as indicated ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.