Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. White

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 18, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DARNEY RAY WHITE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

STIPULATION SETTING MOTIONS SCHEDULE; ORDER Date: April 5, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, that the date for the contested hearing which is currently set for March 1, 2010, be vacated and that a motions schedule be set as follows: defendant's motions in the above-captioned matter to be due on or before March 8, 2010, government's response motions to be due on or before March 22, 2010, and the hearing on these motions be set for April 5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

The parties also agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii), (iv). The reason for the setting of this motions schedule is to permit written objection to the policies and procedures set forth in the AO/Probation contract prohibiting defense retesting at a forensic lab, further defense investigation and discovery review, and counsel is unavailable on March 1, 2010 due to a personal traffic matter in San Mateo County.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii), (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100218

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.