Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ashford v. Barker Management

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 22, 2010

SANDRA ASHFORD
v.
BARKER MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (1) DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FAC, Mary Etta Marks Freddie Fletcher MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT [32]; (2) DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [34]; (3) DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FAC [35]; (4) DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JOINDER IN REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND RELIEF [39] (5) DEFENDANT BANTAN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [42]; (6) DEFENDANT BANTAN'S MOTION FOR JOINDER IN MOTION TO STRIKE [43]; (7) DEFENDANT BANTAN'S MOTION FOR JOINDER IN REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [44] 8) DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JOINDER IN REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, REQUEST FOR RELIEF [53]; 9) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IF MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED [63] (non-evidentiary)

Court circulates issues its tentative ruling and hears oral argument. For reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [34] and DENIES as MOOT (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike Portions of Fac, Motion for More Definite Statement [32]; (3) Defendant's Motion to Strike Portions of Fac [35]; (4) Defendants' Motion for Joinder in Request for Judicial Notice and Relief [39]; (5) Defendant Bantan's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [42]; (6) Defendant Bantan's Motion for Joinder in Motion to Strike [43]; (7) Defendant Bantan's Motion for Joinder in Request for Judicial Notice [44]; (8) Defendants' Motion for Joinder in Request for Judicial Notice, Request for Relief [53]; and (9) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint If Motion to Dismiss Is Granted [63].

In light of today's rulings, the Court instructs plaintiffs to file a third amended complaint, by not later than March 8, 2010.

13

Initials of Preparer SMO

20100222

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.