Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rand v. American National Insurance Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


February 23, 2010

DAPHNE P. RAND, BY AND THROUGH DEBRA J. DOLCH, AS CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF DAPHNE P. RAND, CONSERVATEE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED. PLAINTIFF,
v.
AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION. DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Susan Illston

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER

Action Filed: 02/12/09

This stipulation is made between Plaintiff DAPHNE P. RAND, by and through DEBRA J. DOLCH, as Conservator of the Person and Estate of DAPHNE P. RAND, Conservatee, ("Plaintiff") and Defendant American National Insurance Company ("ANICO" or "Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of records, with respect to the following facts:

WHEREAS, the Court's Civil Pretrial Minute Order dated November 13, 2009 (Docket No. 78) sets forth the current scheduling order.

WHEREAS, the parties stipulated to a one week extension of time for ANICO to respond to the Court's February 9, 2010 Discovery Order concerning contact information for absent class 6 members.

WHEREAS, the parties are still conducting discovery and believe that the current scheduling order should be modified to allow for completion of discovery, resolution of any discovery disputes and any other matters;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that the parties request a revised schedule as follows:

Current Date Proposed Date

Hearing on Motion for Class Certification June 9, 2010 September 1, 2010

Motion due May 5, 2010 June 24, 2010

Opposition due May 19, 2010 August 9, 2010

Reply due May 26, 2010 August 23, 2010

The parties agree to vacate the expert designation and rebuttal expert designation deadlines as well as the expert discovery cut-off. Instead, Plaintiff will designate experts concurrently with the filing of her motion for class certification and Defendant will designate its rebuttal experts concurrently with the filing of its opposition.

DATED: February 19, 2010

BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT P.C. ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff DAPHNE P. RAND, by and through DEBRA J. DOLCH, as Conservator of the Person and Estate of DAPHNE P. RAND, Conservatee

WATERS KRAUS & PAUL IN-GRID M. EVANS Attorneys for Plaintiff DAPHNE P. RAND, by and through DEBRA J. DOLCH, as Conservator of the Person and Estate of DAPHNE P. RAND, Conservatee

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER THOMAS M. HERILHY Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Susan Illston District Court Judge

20100223

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.