Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Weippert

February 25, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
6) BRAIR CAITLYN WEIPPERT SOCIAL SECURITY NO. UNK (LAST 4 DIGITS)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank United States District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date.

FEBRUARY 19, 2010

X WITH COUNSEL Anthony Solis, CJA (Name of Counsel)

X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Knowingly possessed marijuana, a Schedule 1 Controlled Substance. A Lesser offense included in Count Two of the Indictment, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §844.

The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. §3553(a) factors, and the Plea Agreement, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Brair Caitlyn Weippert, is hereby placed on probation on the lesser offense included in Count Two of the Indictment for a term of Five (5) years under the following terms and conditions:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25, which is due immediately. All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay.

The defendant shall not commit any crime -- federal, state, or local;

The defendant shall be truthful at all times with the U.S. Probation Office;

The Court orders the defendant be placed in a residential drug treatment program, as directed by the probation office. Placement in the residential drug treatment program shall be up to nine months or until successful discharge by the Probation Officer, whichever is earlier;

The defendant must apply for entry into the Central District of California's Substance Abuse And Re-entry Program (the "STAR" Program); this application should be made as directed by the probation officer;

If accepted into the star program, the defendant must execute a written Star Program Contract and participate in the Star Program as directed by the Star Program Judicial Officer and the Star Program Probation Officer;

The defendant shall comply with the conditions set forth in General Orders 318, and 01-05 of this Court.

The Court will also impose the drug testing conditions mandated by Title 18,U.S.C. §§3563(a)(5) and 3583(d) and the alcohol and drug use conditions authorized by Title 18, U.S.C. §3563(b)(7).

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. She shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of placement on probation, and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month as directed by the Probation Officer.

Ms. Weippert shall participate in an out-patient substance abuse treatment counseling program as directed by the Probation Officer, that includes urinalysis, saliva and/or sweat patch testing.

Ms. Weippert shall abstain from using any illicit drugs, alcohol, and abusing prescription medications ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.