Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Garrison v. Lopez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 25, 2010

ALVIS GARRISON, PETITIONER,
v.
RAUL LOPEZ, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Petitioner challenges his 2000 conviction from Sacramento County for three counts of robbery, one count of attempted robbery and two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Court records indicate that petitioner previously filed a petition in this court challenging the same conviction in Garrison v. Reynolds, CIV S-02-1544 DFL JFM P.*fn1 On March 23, 2005, 02-1544 DFL JFM P was denied on the merits.

Before a second or successive application for writ of habeas corpus may be filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner has not demonstrated that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has authorized him to proceed with this successive or second application. For that reason, this action must be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action;

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.