United States District Court Northern District of California
March 1, 2010
SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY INC. PLAINTIFF
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, THE BRITA PRODUCTS COMPANY, DELTA FAUCET COMPANY, EVANS MANUFACTURING INC., EVERCARE COMPANY, GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INC., MAGNUM RESEARCH INC., PAVESTONE COMPANY LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC., SPECTRUM BRANDS INC., SUPER SWIM CORP., UNILOCK INC., WEST COAST CHAIN MFG. CO. DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Richard Seeborg
Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Motions Filed by Magnum Research Inc. and [Proposed] Order
Date: March 25, 2010
Plaintiff San Francisco Technology Inc. ("SF Tech") and defendant Magnum Research Inc. ("Magnum Research") stipulate as follows:
1. On January 29, 2010, Magnum Research filed two motions and noticed the hearings to occur on March 25, 2010. Those motions are:
a. Defendant Magnum Research Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss (Docket No. 50)
b. Defendant Magnum Research Inc.'s Notice Of Motion And Motion To Sever And Transfer Venue To District Of Minnesota (Docket No. 51)
2. On Friday, February 26, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel was informed that several other defendants in this case intend to file similar motions on Monday, March 1, 2010, and that those motions will be noticed to be heard on April 8, 2010.
3. For good cause, and to conserve judicial resources, Plaintiff SF Tech and defendant Magnum Research request that the hearing on Magnum Research's motions be continued to April 8, 2010 at 1:30pm so they can be heard concurrently with the other defendants' motions. The stipulating parties also request that the deadlines for filing opposition and reply papers be continued to correspond to the changed hearing date.
Date: March 1, 2010
Mount & Stoelker, P.C., Dan Fingerman Attorneys for San Francisco Technology Inc.
Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. David A. Davenport Attorneys for Magnum Research Inc.
As the attorney electronically filing, I attest that each signatory has concurred in this filing.
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Richard Seeborg, U.S. District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.