Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Ok

March 5, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
EDWARD SEUNG OK SOCIAL SECURITY NO. 0 8 0 6; 0826 SEUNG MOK OK; ED BRANDON; MOK OK SUNG; SUNG MOOK



The opinion of the court was delivered by: George H. King, U. S. District Judge

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 02 17 2010

Y WITH COUNSEL ROGER ROSEN, RETAINED

(Name of Counsel)

Y GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a FINDING of Y GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: MAIL FRAUD CAUSING AN ACT TO BE DONE; In Violation of TITLE 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 2; as charged in Counts 5 and 14 of the Second Superseding Indictment.

The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, which is due immediately.

It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay a fine in the amount of $75,000 on Count 5 and $75,000 on Count 14, for a total fine of $150,000. The fine shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the date of this judgment.

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for

One Hundred Eighty (180) months. This term consists of 180 months on each of Counts 5 and 14 of the Second Superseding Indictment, to be served concurrently.

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three (3) years. This term consists of 3 years on each of Counts 5 and 14, all such terms to run concurrently under the following terms and conditions:

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment

The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment, and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, not to exceed eight tests per month, as directed by the Probation Officer;

The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath, and/or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall abstain from using illicit drugs and alcohol, and abusing prescription medications during the period of supervision

During the course of supervision, the Probation Officer, with the agreement of the defendant and defense counsel, may place the defendant in a residential drug treatment program approved by the U. S. Probation Office for treatment of narcotic addiction or drug dependency, which may include counseling and testing, to determine if the defendant has reverted to the use of drugs, and the defendant shall reside in the treatment program until discharged by the Program Director and Probation Officer;

As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's drug/alcohol dependency to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;

The Court authorizes the Probation Office to disclose the Presentence Report to the substance abuse treatment provider to facilitate the defendant's treatment for narcotic addiction or drug dependency. Further redisclosure of the Presentence Report by the treatment provider is prohibited without the consent of the Court;

The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity wherein he has custody, control or management of his employer's funds;

The defendant shall not obtain or possess any driver's license, Social Security number, birth certificate, passport or any other form of identification in any name, other than the defendant's true legal name, without the prior written approval of the Probation Officer; nor shall the defendant use, for any purpose or in any manner, any name other than his true legal name;

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.

In light of the breach of the plea agreement, the government does not move to dismiss the remaining counts at this time.

that the defendant be allowed to participate in the RDAP program.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the defendant be designated to a facility in the Southern California area.

Defendant informed of his right to appeal.

In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, may issue a warrant and revoke supervision for a violation occurring during the

It is ordered that the Clerk deliver a copy of this Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order to the U.S. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.