IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 5, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT,
MARIA COTA, MOVANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
By Order filed January 21, 2010, movant's post-conviction motions of October 29, 2007, and October 28, 2008, were summarily dismissed as non-cognizable pleadings. Movant's subsequent request directed to the Clerk of the Court to review the records to determine whether her amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was filed timely was liberally construed as a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and was denied by Order filed on February 11, 2010. Once again, movant inappropriately addresses a request to the Clerk of the Court. Movant's persistence in filing seriatum, substanceless requests, motions, etc., unnecessarily burden this court. This filing will be disregarded as will all future filings in this case.
Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of the Court is to disregard movant's request directed to the Clerk of the Court (docket # 85); and
2. All future filings in this case by movant are to be docketed but disregarded by the Clerk.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.