IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 5, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
CHARLES HEAD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge: Honorable Edmund F. Brennan
DEFENDANT BROTEMARKLE'S WAIVER OF APPEARANCE AT MARCH 5, 2010, P.I.A. (F.R.C.P. 10(b)
Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 10(b), defendant KEITH BROTEMARKLE, hereby waives his right to be present at the March 5, 2010, arraignment on the first superseding indictment in this matter.
Defendant has received a copy of the superseding indictment and requests the Court to proceed as if he were there to personally plead not guilty.
Dated: February 25, 2010
/s/ KEITH BROTEMARKLE (Original retained by attorney)
I concur in Mr. Brotemarkle's decision to waive his presence at arraignment upon the first superseding indictment in this matter.
Dated: February 27, 2010
ROBERT G. GAZLEY Attorney at Law Attorney for Defendant KEITH BROTEMARKLE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.