Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. Williams

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 10, 2010

RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
B. C. WILLIAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

By order filed February 9, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had stated sufficient charging allegations against defendant Williams and informed plaintiff he could proceed against that defendant only or file an amended complaint that also states a claim against defendants Haydenfield and Hadnell. The court also informed plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to proceed only as to defendant Williams as consent to the dismissal of the remaining defendants. On February 25, 2010, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendant Williams.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Haydenfield and Hadnell are dismissed without prejudice.

20100310

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.