Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Murillo v. City of Woodland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 10, 2010

DESIREE MURILLO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF WOODLAND, RYAN PIERCY, CASEY SULLIVAN, AND DOES 1 TO 40, INCLUSIVE,

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff indicates in the parties' Status Report filed February 23, 2010 that Defendant Ryan Piercy ("Piercy")could be served soon, and the Doe Defendants could be identified by March 15, 2010. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for March 15, 2010, is continued to April 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than (14 days prior).

Moreover, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure since Piercy has not served with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule since the filing of the original complaint on November 9, 2009, Piercy could be dismissed as a defendant in this action unless Plaintiff provides proof of service and/or "shows good cause for the failure" to serve within this prescribed period in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on March 19, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100310

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.