IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 11, 2010
MICHAEL CHESS, PLAINTIFF,
D.K. SISTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. There are currently two motions for summary judgment pending, filed on September 14, 2009, (Dkt. No. 43) and February 12, 2010, (Dkt. No. 70). Pursuant to the court's April 17, 2009, Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 31), discovery was to be completed by August 14, 2009, and any motions to compel discovery were required to be filed by that date. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff's February 24, 2010 motion for leave to file a motion to compel discovery of two sets of interrogatories he served on defendants on August 9 and 22, 2009.
Plaintiff contends that he was ill during May, June, July and August 2009 and was thus unable to timely file discovery requests and a motion to compel. Assuming that plaintiff was ill during that time, there is no explanation why plaintiff has delayed six months since the close of discovery to file this motion to compel. Discovery will not be reopened and plaintiff's motion to compel is denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 75) is denied
2. Plaintiff's November 25, 2009, motion to amend his opposition to summary judgment (Dkt. No. 55) is granted and the court will consider plaintiff's additional pages that were annexed to that motion.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.