IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 11, 2010
CHARLES T. DAVIS, PLAINTIFF,
C/O KISSINGER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On March 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed February 25, 2010, denying his motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed February 25, 2010, is affirmed.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.