IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 12, 2010
KHALIFAH E.D. SAIF'ULLAH, PLAINTIFF,
JATINDER SINGH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
On March 4, 2010, plaintiff filed a document which the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the court's denial of petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis. A court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the . . . court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263. Plaintiff fails to point to anything suggesting reconsideration is appropriate. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 4, 2010 motion for reconsideration is denied.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.