UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 15, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ERIC DIALLO BEVERLY
USM No. 93105-111
Date of Previous Judgment: April 3, 2006
Rita Bosworth (AFPD) Defendant's Attorney
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)
Order Regarding Motion or Stipulation for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion; or ' Upon stipulation of the parties,
IT IS ORDERED that motion is:
9 DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 188 months is reduced to 180 months .
IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation is 9DISAPPROVED. 9 APPROVED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ______________ months is reduced to ______________.
Previous Offense Level: 31 Amended Offense Level: 29 Criminal History Category: VI Criminal History Category: VI Previous Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months Amended Guideline Range: 151 to 188 months
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE(Prior to Any Departures)
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. 9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. 9 Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated April 3, 2006 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.