IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 17, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
RONALD LEON MARSHALL, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING SCHEDULE AND HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: May 14, 2010 Time: 10:00 a.m.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that a new sentencing schedule be set as follows:
counsel that a new trial schedule be set as follows:
Event: Present Date: Requested New Date:
Report Available March 19, 2010 April 9, 2010
Informal Objections Due April 2, 2010 April 23, 2010
Formal Objections Due April 16, 2010 May 7, 2010
Sentencing Hearing April 23, 2010 - 10:00 A.M. May 14, 2010 - 10:00 A.M.
This continuance is requested because counsel for defendant has been engaged in trial and has not been available to schedule a probation interview. Additional time is necessary to conduct that interview and prepare the requisite presentence investigation report. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.
The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for further defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice will be served by a continuance.
DATED: March 12, 2010
Good cause is apparent. Time is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.