United States District Court Eastern District of California
March 24, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edward J. Garcia, United States District Judge Name & Title of Judicial Officer
JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE
(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)
(For Offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987)
Linda Harter, Asst. Federal Defender
admitted guilt to violation of charge 1 as alleged in the violation petition filed on 02/19/2010 . was found in violation of condition(s) of supervision as to charge(s) after denial of guilt, as alleged in the violation petition filed on .
ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilty of the following violation(s):
Nature of Violation Date Violation Occurred
New Law Violation 06/23/2008
U] revokes: [ ] modifies: [ ] continues under same conditions of supervision heretofore ordered on 12/10/2001 .
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
Charges 2,3, and 4 are dismissed.
Any previously imposed criminal monetary penalties that remain unpaid shall remain in effect.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.
03/19/2010 Date of Imposition of Sentence
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term .
The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:
The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.
The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district. [ ] at on . [ ] as notified by the United States Marshal. The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: [ ] before on . [ ] as notified by the United States Marshal. [ ] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Officer.
If no such institution has been designated, to the United States Marshal for this district.
I have executed this judgment as follows:
Defendant delivered on to at, with a certified copy of this judgment.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
By Deputy U.S. Marshal
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.