Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Forkner

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 25, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAVID ROBBIE FORKNER, AND LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Hon. Garland E. Burrell

The parties request that the status conference currently set for March 26, 2010, be continued to April 23, 2010, and stipulate that the time beginning March 26, 2010, and extending through April 23, 2010, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for each defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4.

The parties need additional time for preparation.

Therefore, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court set the date of April 23, 2010, for the status conference.

The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney

Dated: March 24, 2010

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: March 24, 2010

JOHN MANNING Attorney for defendant DAVID ROBBIE FORKNER

Dated: March 24, 2010

DENNIS S. WAKS Attorney for defendant LORETTA LEIGH CANHAM

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the status conference for defendants, David Robbie Forkner and Loretta Leigh Canham, in case number CR. S-08-0363-GEB, currently set for March 26, 2010, is continued to April 23, 2010; and the time beginning March 26, 2010, and extending through April 23, 2010, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective defense preparation. The Court finds that interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100325

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.