Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Frize v. Hernandez
March 26, 2010
MICHAEL SCOTT FRIZE, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT J. HERNANDEZ, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Margaret M. Morrow United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its de novo review, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on all parties.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...