Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hoskins v. California Dep't of Corrections and Rehabilitations

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 29, 2010

RUDOLPH HOSKINS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient in that it did not include the required original signature of an authorized officer at the institution of incarceration on the second page of the application.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with a certified copy of an inmate trust account statement signed by an authorized officer, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action.

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100329

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.