Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Muscadine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


March 31, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GARY MUSCADINE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT DATE TO APRIL 13, 2010 AND TO Date: April 6, 2010 Time: 11:00 a.m.

Armstrong The parties jointly requested that the hearing in this matter be continued from April 6, 2010 to April 13, 2010 and that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between April 6, 2010 and April 13, 2010 to allow for the effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and continuity of defense counsel. Defense counsel will be unavailable on April 6, 2010. For this stated reason, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweighs the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. Good cause appearing therefor, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 21 (B)(iv), 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion hearing in this matter is continued from 23 April 6, 2010 to April 13, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., and that time between April 6, 2010 and April 13, 24 2010 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the effective preparation of counsel, 25 taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and continuity of defense counsel.

20100331

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.