The opinion of the court was delivered by: Philip S. Gutierrez, U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 03 29 2010
X WITH COUNSEL CJA Ed Robinson (Name of Counsel)
GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO CONTENDERE
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Embezzlement and Theft of Labor Union Assets, in violation of Title 29 U.S.C. § 501(c), as charged in the Single-Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due
All fines are waived as it is found that such sanction would place an undue burden on the defendant's
The Court recommends that the Bureau of Prisons conduct a mental health evaluation of the defendant and provide all necessary treatment.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three
under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
The defendant shall participate in mental health treatment, which may include evaluation and counseling, until discharged from the treatment by the treatment provider, with the approval of the Probation Officer;
As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall pay all or part of the costs of treating the defendant's psychiatric disorder to the aftercare contractor during the period of community supervision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3672. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
When not employed or excused by the Probation Officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons, the defendant shall perform 20 hours of community service per week as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not be employed in any capacity wherein she has custody, control or management of her employer's funds;
The defendant shall not obtain or possess any driver's license, Social Security number, birth certificate, passport or any other form of identification in any name, other than the defendant's true legal name; nor shall the defendant use, for any purpose or in any manner, any name other than her true legal name or names without the prior written approval of the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall be prohibited from serving as an officer or in any other position described in Title 29 U.S.C. § 504 in or for any labor organization, other than as a member for a period of 13 years, unless this Court subsequently orders a lesser period of prohibition;
Defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $121,475 to victims as set forth in a separate victim list prepared by the Probation Office which this Court adopts and which reflects the Court's determination of the amount of restitution due to each victim. The victim list, which shall be forwarded to the Fiscal Section of the Clerk's Office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the victims; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)(2)(D), the Court authorizes the Probation Officer to disclose the Presentence Report, and/or any previous mental health evaluations or reports, to the treatment provider. The treatment provider may provide information (excluding the Presentence Report), to State or local social service agencies (such as the State of California, Department of Social Services), for the purpose of the client's rehabilitation.
The defendant is advised of the right to appeal.
The Court recommends that the defendant be designated to Victorville Correctional facility, or in the alternative, a Southern California facility, or in the alternative the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, ...