Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alvarado v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 1, 2010

ISMAEL JOSE ALVARADO, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES HARTLEY, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: S. James Otero United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice.

20100401

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.