Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kemper v. Ca. Dep't of Transportation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 1, 2010

EDWARD L. KEMPER AND CONNIE J. ARNOLD, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT, AND PARATRANSIT, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On March 30, 2010, the parties and counsel met for a renewed settlement conference. After further discussion, it was agreed that defendants would prepare proposed final resolution documents regarding prospective relief to be served on plaintiff and the undersigned no later than April 30, 2010.

Plaintiff shall serve on all defendants and the undersigned a damages demand and an attorneys' fees/costs request. The attorneys' fees request shall in categorical terms describe the services for which the fees are sought. For example, pre-Complaint review and consultation, X hours, Drafting Complaint, Y hours, Discovery, Z hours, and so forth.

It was further agreed that a final settlement conference would be set for May 4, 2010 (Plaintiff, City of Citrus Heights and RT) and May 5, 2010 (Plaintiff, County of Sacramento and RT). Both conferences shall begin at 9:00 a.m.

The parties are encouraged to discuss with each other, to the extent possible, terms of the final prospective relief resolution. The undersigned will not be miffed if the parties have completely resolved their remaining differences prior to conference.

20100401

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.