IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 7, 2010
BOB SAVAGE, PLAINTIFF,
SUZAN HUBBARD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
On March 15, 2010, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the magistrate judge's amended discovery and scheduling order filed March 4, 2010. The court construes this as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.*fn1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 4, 2010, is affirmed.