Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Federal Trade Commission v. Data Medical Capital

April 8, 2010

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, CONTEMPT JUDGMENT AS TO BRYAN D'ANTONIO, THE RODIS LAW GROUP, INC., AMERICA'S LAW GROUP, AND THE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. PLAINTIFF,
v.
DATA MEDICAL CAPITAL, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Alicemarie H. Stotler United States District Judge

The Court, having issued its Order Adjudicating Contempt Defendants in Contempt of Court and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support Thereof ("Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law") on January 15, 2010, which found Contempt Defendants Bryan D'Antonio, The Rodis Law Group, Inc. ("RLG"), America's Law Group ("ALG"), and The Financial Group, Inc. ("TFG") dba Tax Relief ASAP (collectively, "Contempt Defendants") in contempt of the Stipulated Final Judgment entered by this Court on July 13, 2001, and on March 16, 2010, after supplemental briefing and argument by the parties at a March 1, 2010 hearing, having assessed civil contempt sanctions, finding Contempt Defendants to be jointly and severally liable in the amount of $11,406,681, now enters its Contempt Judgment as follows.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

A. Judgment is entered, jointly and severally, against Contempt Defendants Bryan D'Antonio, The Rodis Law Group, Inc., America's Law Group, and The Financial Group, Inc. dba Tax Relief ASAP in favor of the FTC in the amount of eleven million four hundred and six thousand six hundred and eighty-one dollars ($11,406,681) as a compensatory contempt remedy for their violation of the 2001 Stipulated Final Judgment, and is immediately due and payable. The Commission is authorized to execute upon the judgment immediately and engage in discovery in aid of execution.

B.1. Contempt Defendants shall be deemed to have relinquished to the Commission all right, title, and interest in all Receivership Assets, and shall take any steps necessary to turn over such assets to the Commission or Receiver.

B.2. Defendant Bryan D'Antonio shall be deemed to have relinquished to the Commission all right, title, and interest in any personal assets subject to the asset freeze imposed by the Court's May 27, 2009 Temporary Restraining Order, as modified by the Court's June 22, 2009, Preliminary Injunction Order, including, but not limited to, D'Antonio's TD Ameritrade account ending in no. 3427 and all assets and funds contained in said account. D'Antonio shall take any steps necessary to turn over such assets to the Commission.

C. Any funds received by the FTC pursuant to the foregoing shall be deposited into a fund administered by the FTC or its representative to be used for consumer compensation, including any attendant expenses for the administration of such a compensation fund. In the event that direct compensation to consumers is wholly or partially impracticable or funds remain after compensation is completed, the Commission may apply any remaining funds for such equitable relief (including consumer information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Defendants' practices alleged in the Complaint. Any funds not so used shall be deposited to the U.S. Treasury as equitable disgorgement.

Contempt Defendants shall have no right to challenge the FTC's choice of remedies or the manner of distribution.

D. The Judgment is compensatory in nature, and not a fine, penalty, punitive assessment, or forfeiture.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the freeze of Contempt Defendants' assets, including the assets of the Receivership Defendants and the assets of Bryan D'Antonio, shall remain in effect, except as necessary for the Receiver to liquidate all Receivership Assets, until all frozen assets have been transferred to the Commission or the Receiver and the Receiver winds up all activities and operations of the Receivership Defendants pursuant to provisions herein. The asset freeze is modified to permit transfers to the Commission pursuant to this Contempt Judgment and, upon completion of those transfers, the asset freeze shall be dissolved.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Robb Evans & Associates, LLC is appointed as permanent receiver, with the full power of an equity receiver, for the Receivership Defendants, and of all the funds, properties, premises, accounts and other assets directly or indirectly owned, beneficially or otherwise, by the Receivership Defendants, with directions and authority to accomplish the following:

A. Maintain full control of the Receivership Defendants; B. Maintain custody, control, and possession of all assets and documents, including the funds, property, premises, accounts, mail and other assets of, or in the possession or under the control of, the Receivership Defendants, wherever situated, the income and profits therefrom, and all sums of money now or hereafter due or owing to the Receivership Defendants, with full power to collect, receive and take possession of all assets and documents, including goods, chattels, rights, credits, monies, effects, lands, leases, books and records, work papers, and records of accounts, including computer-maintained information, contracts, financial records, monies on hand in banks and other financial institutions, and other papers and documents of the Receivership Defendants and customers of the Receivership Defendants whose interests are now held by or under the direction, possession, custody, or control of the Receivership Defendants;

C. Continue performing all acts necessary to locate and preserve the value of those assets, in order to prevent any irreparable loss, damage or injury to customers of the Receivership Defendants, and all acts incidental thereto;

D. Enter into agreements in connection with the administration of the Receivership Estate, including, but not limited to: (1) the retention and employment of outside investigators, attorneys or accountants of the Receiver's choice to assist, advise, and represent the Receiver with approval of the Court; (2) the movement and storage of any equipment, furniture, records, files, or other physical property of the Receivership Defendants; and (3) the retention of auctioneers or other professionals to assist in the liquidation of the Receivership Defendants' assets;

E. Institute, prosecute, compromise, adjust, intervene in or become party to such actions or proceedings in state, federal, or foreign courts that the Receiver deems necessary and advisable to preserve or increase the value of the Receivership Estate, or that the Receiver deems necessary and advisable to carry out the Receiver's mandate under this Order, and likewise to defend, compromise, or adjust or otherwise dispose of any and all actions or proceedings instituted against the Receiver or the Receivership Defendants that the Receiver deems necessary and advisable to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.