IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 11, 2010
BARRY LAMON, PLAINTIFF,
DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
On March 25, 2010, plaintiff filed objections, construed as a request for reconsideration, to the magistrate judge's order filed March 18, 2010, requesting counsel for the defendants to facilitate the shipment of plaintiff's other legal materials from CSP-Corcoran. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge (Docket No. 178), is affirmed.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.