Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bun v. Felker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 12, 2010

CHANTHON BUN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T. FELKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

By order filed February 25, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had stated sufficient charging allegations against defendants Watkins, Perry, Hook, Lower, Hanshumaker, Ramsey, Sanchez, Essman, Kirkland, Garate, Kissinger, Marsh, Brown, Aurich, and Felker and informed plaintiff he could proceed against those defendants only or file an amended complaint that also states a claim against the remaining defendants. The court also informed plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to proceed only as to defendants Watkins, Perry, Hook, Lower, Hanshumaker, Ramsey, Sanchez, Essman, Kirkland, Garate, Kissinger, Marsh, Brown, Aurich, and Felker as consent to the dismissal of all remaining defendants. On March 15, 2010, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Watkins, Perry, Hook, Lower, Hanshumaker, Ramsey, Sanchez, Essman, Kirkland, Garate, Kissinger, Marsh, Brown, Aurich, and Felker.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against all remaining defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

20100412

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.