Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carpenter v. Sullivan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 12, 2010

WILLIE LEE CARPENTER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
W. J. SULLIVAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 22, 2007. On September 17, 2008, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. On November 17, 2008, an order issued, finding that the original complaint stated a claim as to Defendants Gonzalez, Barajas, Ortiz, Pfeil, Sullivan, Evans and Carrasco. Plaintiff returned the USM 285 forms for service of process and the court ordered service of the original complaint.

On January 6, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint.*fn1 On February 10, 2009, Defendants filed an answer to the original complaint. On February 11, 2009, Plaintiff was directed to inform the court whether he intended to file a second amended complaint or proceed on the September 17, 2008, first amended complaint. On February 27, 2009, Plaintiff advised the court that he intends to proceed on the September 17, 2008, first amended complaint.

The court has screened the September 17, 2008, first amended complaint, and finds that, as to the defendants that have answered the original complaint, the first amended complaint states a claim for relief. Specifically, the first amended complaint states a claim for relief as to Defendants Gonzalez, Barrajas and Ortiz for excessive force on June 6, 2004. The first amended complaint states a claim against Defendant Pfeil for excessive force on January 20, 2005 and Defendants Sullivan, Evans and Carrasco for failure to protect. The first amended complaint also states a claim against Defendant Litton for excessive force on January 20, 2005 and Defendants A. Salazar, J. Martinez for failure to protect on June 6, 2004. Plaintiff will be directed to complete and return to the court forms for service of process upon these defendants by separate order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants A. Pfeil, J. Gonzales, J. Barajas and M. Ortiz shall file a response to the September 17, 2008, first amended complaint within thirty days of the date of service of this order. Upon filing an answer, a discovery and scheduling order will issue, setting a schedule for further litigation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.