IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 15, 2010
MICHAEL WAYNE WEBSTER, PLAINTIFF,
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT., DEFENDANT.
Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. By an order filed January 6, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.*fn1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.