Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mayberry v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 16, 2010

BILLY MAYBERRY, PETITIONER,
v.
J. D. HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REVIEW CASE [Doc. #6]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On September 2, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion requesting the Court to review the instant case. As Petitioner correctly states, the instant action is pending before this Court. The Court is aware of the petition. However, the Court does not have an expedited calendar. Petitioner is advised that the Court acts to resolve all pending cases in the most efficient manner possible. Nevertheless, the Court's docket of pending cases is substantial, and the Court must act first on those matters that have been pending the longest.

Accordingly, Petitioner's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100416

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.