Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 20, 2010

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CORPORATION; UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANT.
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, A PUBLIC BODY, CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CORPORATION; UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge

RELATED CASE ORDER

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation of the actions is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated 2:10-CV-00634-LKK-KJN be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:10-CV-00634-JAM-JFM.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100420

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.