Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anaya v. Campbell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 21, 2010

RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On April 5, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the claims against defendants Felkner, Perez, Hale, James, Agyman, Clark, Hamilton, Casperite and Hoepner. Plaintiff states that he wishes to proceed to trial only as to the claims against defendants Subia, Nale, Akintola, Smith, Johnson and Williams. Defendants are directed to notify the court whether they have any objection to the dismissal of the defendants identified in plaintiff's April 5, 2010, pleading.

Plaintiff's April 5, 2010, pleading does not address the remaining claims against defendant Huerta-Garcia.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within seven days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he intends to proceed to trial as to the claims against defendant Huerta-Garcia;

2. Defendants shall notify this court, within seven days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of the claims against defendants Felkner, Perez, Hale, James, Agyman, Clark, Hamilton, Casperite and Hoepner. Should defendants fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

20100421

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.