Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Ogundimo v. Steadfast Property & Development
April 23, 2010
CARLOTTA OGUNDIMO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STEADFAST PROPERTY & DEVELOPMENT, ET AL, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 92)
On February 26, 2010, Plaintiff Carlotta Ogundimo moved for default judgment against Defendant Steadfast Park West, L.P.*fn1
According to Plaintiff, default judgment is appropriate because Steadfast failed to submit certain documentation to Plaintiff by February 17, 2010:
2010 Preliminary Injunction
ALL DOCUMENTS due to the Plaintiffs the Defendants by February to SUBMIT 2010 [...] 17, Defendants papers but Plaintiff argued that was Plaintiff not ordered did not the send them
Defendants any papers. the by court to give Defendants Work
Orders the council If papers them from his client himself. [sic] could have are gotten
Therefore, to have followed it leaves Judges no excuse Order for the Defendant not Plaintiffs move the court for a of default the Court. against Defendants Steadfast. judgment (Doc. 92, pg. 1) (emphasis in original).
Plaintiff's document is properly considered as a motion for default judgment brought pursuant to Rule 55 of the ...