Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wilson v. Bradshaw Consulting Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 23, 2010

JOSEPH WILSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRADSHAW CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., A SOUTH CAROLINA CORPORATION; TONY L. BRADSHAW, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER AMENDING THE SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 ORDER

On November 24, 2009, the parties filed a Stipulation regarding the September 10, 2009, Order ("Order") filed in this case, which granted the Defendants' motions to dismiss. The parties state in the Stipulation that the Order "[a]s it is presently worded . . . may imply incorrectly that Plaintiff's second, third and sixth claims were dismissed as to both [Defendants]" when "Defendants requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's second, third, and sixth claims against Defendant Tony Bradshaw only." (Stip. 2:18-22.) Lines 17 through 20 of the Order are amended as follows in accordance with the parties' stipulation:

Also on August 4, 2009[,] Bradshaw and Defendant Bradshaw Consulting Services, Inc. filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff's second, third and sixth claims for relief against Defendant Tony Bradshaw and Plaintiff's fifth claim for relief against Defendant Tony Bradshaw and Defendant Bradshaw Consulting Services, Inc. for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

(Stip. 2:27-3:3.)

20100423

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.